ext_23656 ([identity profile] eviltigerlily.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] reddwarfslash2006-12-11 12:43 am

Question

Well, sort of. I see there's been some discussion lately regarding VIII and Rimmer in particular, which I er... missed. And well... There is this thing in BITR that always bothered me. In the trial scene the posse have to sign a consent form to be tried by mind probe using psychotropic drugs, but Rimmer never does. Can that be legal? Without Rimmer's trial they would have nothing on the rest either. Personally I believe they have been wrongfully imprisoned. They should be released immedately!

*glances up*
I will go quietly away now.

[identity profile] typhonblue.livejournal.com 2006-12-11 02:41 am (UTC)(link)
I'm thinking he wants to keep acting in the same bureaucratic rubber stamping way, but with them out of the picture so as not to interfer with him.

I'm just curious why cone-head Holly is going along with it.


[identity profile] roadstergal.livejournal.com 2006-12-11 02:45 am (UTC)(link)
Why wouldn't he go along with it? Hollister's the captain.

Most employees give up some rights when they sign a contract. Hollister has gotten to his position by weaseling the system (as his self-confession in BITR), and is probably really good at it by now. So he'll find the way to administer the tests without explicit consent. As long as he's the captain, Holly will obey him.

[identity profile] typhonblue.livejournal.com 2006-12-11 02:58 am (UTC)(link)
But, you'd think if Hollister was finagelling the system Holly would have something to say about it. But maybe egghead Holly has less of a personality then our Holly.

[identity profile] roadstergal.livejournal.com 2006-12-11 03:00 am (UTC)(link)
Hollister implies that he's been fudging the system throughout his entire career, from donut boy to captain.

[identity profile] typhonblue.livejournal.com 2006-12-11 03:03 am (UTC)(link)
What I mean is, perhaps that wasn't as blatantly obvious as Hollister throwing regulations (or what have you) out the window when he questions Rimmer.

You'd think Holly would be aware of that, but, maybe not?

[identity profile] roadstergal.livejournal.com 2006-12-11 03:08 am (UTC)(link)
That's exactly it - we don't know if he threw regulations out of the window. We don't know that the contract with JMC doesn't allow for questioning without consent forms. It might very well. Certainly, since Holly goes along with it, it implies that it does - or that something can be finagled by a good finagler to make such questioning nominally legal.

[identity profile] typhonblue.livejournal.com 2006-12-11 03:19 am (UTC)(link)
These are things that must be known! XD

[identity profile] typhonblue.livejournal.com 2006-12-11 06:59 am (UTC)(link)
Perhaps we can write to him and request it?