http://janamelie.livejournal.com/ ([identity profile] janamelie.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] reddwarfslash2012-05-19 10:00 pm

Rimmer And Yvonne McGruder

There's a thread on TOS about the morality of Rimmer sleeping with McGruder while she was suffering from concussion.  Personally I've always assumed that if she'd been discharged from the medibay then she was sufficiently "with it" to know what she was doing.  I also accepted the "Last Human" retcon which explains a lot more about what went on that night.  (Spoilers in the thread just in case anyone hasn't read it.)

But reading some of the points brought up in this thread makes me uncomfortable.  Wondering how others interpret it.

http://www.reddwarf.co.uk/forum/messages.cfm?threadid=B9128677-1999-AFED-B439706F293BF2EA

Sorry to bring up such an unsavoury topic, but it's something that clearly had a big impact on Rimmer and is referenced quite a lot in the series.

[identity profile] amy-wolf.livejournal.com 2012-05-19 09:32 pm (UTC)(link)
I think we have limited information on what happened and it's extremely open to interpretation. It could be interpreted as a rape, and I think that's actually the most obvious and straightforward interpretation if you don't take the novels into account. (If she was too impaired to know who she was having sex with, he knew that, and he chose to go through with it anyway, I'd call it rape.)

I don't think it's the only possible interpretation, especially considering the novels. You could, for instance, come up with a scenario where she was clearly willing and misspoke a few times when addressing Rimmer, and Lister exaggerated the whole thing for a joke, and I wouldn't call that rape. (The whole question of mental impairment and consent can be really tricky, especially without knowing the specifics. That's why the whole "How drunk is drunk" thing keeps coming up in terms of alcohol and consent.) And I want to interpret it that way, because I like Rimmer and I don't want him to be a rapist.

[identity profile] amy-wolf.livejournal.com 2012-05-19 11:28 pm (UTC)(link)
I think they originally meant for Rimmer to be more awful, and gradually made him more sympathetic as things went on. So this was kind of like the "Did Rimmer kill everyone on the ship?" question - they originally wrote it to make him look pretty horrible, but then rewrote it so he'd be much more sympathetic.

[identity profile] amy-wolf.livejournal.com 2012-05-20 12:52 am (UTC)(link)
Sometimes people do ignore that sort of thing, sadly. But Lister not only ignoring it all, but teasing Rimmer about it later means that either it was actually consensual and he was exaggerating her confusion, or he's a terrible person.