http://janamelie.livejournal.com/ (
janamelie.livejournal.com) wrote in
reddwarfslash2015-02-08 10:10 pm
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Labels In RD Fic (Or Lack Thereof)
A comment I left on a RD slash fic on AO3 and its author's reply set me thinking about the extremely relaxed approach to labels which virtually all RD fic writers seem to have. With Michael_McGruder's permission I'm reproducing the exchange here. (You can also find a link to their fic in the first comment to this entry; I recommend the whole series it's a part of.)
Me: You know, I think this is the first time I've read the word "bisexual" in an actual RD fic as opposed to meta. Not a criticism, just an observation.
MM: Yeah, I'm not sure why everyone is so skittish about defining anyone as bisexual in fics, considering nearly 100% of them make Lister bi.
It's a good question. I'm not sure whether it's because we're usually talking about Lister rather than Rimmer. While the canonical evidence of his interest in women is undeniable (and no-one's trying to deny it) he also seems pretty likely to dislike the whole concept of labels.
Alternatively, it could be because of RD's setting and the fact that there are no humans around to make definitions necessary. Or maybe there's just something about this show which encourages a laid back, laissez-faire approach to this kind of thing, much as no-one's bothered about defining Rimmer or Lister as a top or a bottom. What do you think? :)
Me: You know, I think this is the first time I've read the word "bisexual" in an actual RD fic as opposed to meta. Not a criticism, just an observation.
MM: Yeah, I'm not sure why everyone is so skittish about defining anyone as bisexual in fics, considering nearly 100% of them make Lister bi.
It's a good question. I'm not sure whether it's because we're usually talking about Lister rather than Rimmer. While the canonical evidence of his interest in women is undeniable (and no-one's trying to deny it) he also seems pretty likely to dislike the whole concept of labels.
Alternatively, it could be because of RD's setting and the fact that there are no humans around to make definitions necessary. Or maybe there's just something about this show which encourages a laid back, laissez-faire approach to this kind of thing, much as no-one's bothered about defining Rimmer or Lister as a top or a bottom. What do you think? :)
no subject
(Don't be put off by the archive warnings - they refer to a dream Rimmer has, not his relationship with Lister.)
no subject
In my own head-canon, I just don't see labels as being necessary. I imagine people sleeping with whomever they like without any real thought about needing to "call" it something, whether they like sleeping with one gender, many genders, or no genders. It's probably just my envisioning the future the way that I wish the present was now. :)
(no subject)
no subject
If he's written as never/rarely having thought of men that way, though, the unwillingness to label might come from not wanting to presume. It's like in Corrie (-_- I know, I know, it's a soap, but) when Marcus called himself "a gay man who's in love with a woman" when he was with Maria. I know people in real life as well who identify similarly, and it would be rude of me, a non-queer person, to question that, you know? It's easier in a way to portray Lister as doing whatever/whoever and let him figure out "offscreen" what his orientation is.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-14 23:02 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
The thing about this "labels" business, is that it never, ever comes up, unless a character is identifying as bisexual. Many fics have one or more of the characters coming out as gay, and I've never heard anyone say, "ooh, labeling him gay seems a bit specific." It seems to be related to the overall problem of bi-erasure, but I don't want to speculate too much on where other people are coming from in their aversion to the word "bisexual."
As for the political sentiments in RD canon, which I attempted to address on Tumblr once but for some reason it digressed into Ionian politics about equal rights for the dead... The idea that in the future people beyond labels is demonstrably untrue. Yes, there's the business of Lister and Kochanski's conversation in Duct Soup, where the whole thing felt a bit weird, but all of VII was a bit weird and it's canon whether people like it or not.
It's not just Lister feeling funny about being gay in another dimension or Bent Bob. Herman Goering is referred to as a transvestite, in IWCD Lister comments Ken is a transvestite, Lister ribs Rimmer about the fact that he looks like he could get a man with the giant hair Holly gave him, Rimmer is notoriously homophobic, Ace comments that he didn't realize Bongo was non-hetero, Rimmer commenting that Lister's ex in Dear Dave was probably a man... Sexuality, sexual preference, and sexual identity are conversations in Red Dwarf canon.
Going back to my original comment on AO3, it just seems totally bizarre to me that when almost all of the RD fiction involve bisexual characters, people aren't very keen to actually say it openly.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
This may be influenced by my own dislike of labels to pigeonhole my own sexuality. I'm happily hetero-married, but do not consider myself 100% straight, however for me, the term bisexual doesn't really seem to fit either. I am physically attracted to women. I have had sex with women and still regularly fantasise about women, but I have never had 'a crush' as such or actually been in love with a woman. Possibly I'm hetero-romantic and bisexual but to be honest, the whole idea of putting it into words like that irks me. I am me. I either want to have sex with someone or I don't, and I don't feel the need to quantify it, although I understand why other people like to and find it comforting. Its just not for me.
(no subject)
no subject