ext_45940 (![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
roadstergal.livejournal.com) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
reddwarfslash2006-02-24 09:22 am
roadstergal.livejournal.com) wrote in reddwarfslash2006-02-24 09:22 am
Backwards
I just got ahold of Backwards and read it last night. And now...
I'm having a plotbunny involving Rimmer and a spikey hooked Cat penis. Yeeks.
I really have to say, after reading it, I wonder about what Grant and Naylor each brought to the series. One of my main problems with VII is that many of the episodes seem to be... not-tightly-written; things go by quickly and aren't tied together well (the latter half of Epideme particularly), and that's exactly what Backwards had - that tight tie-together of events (that I think was best, TV-series-wise, in Gunmen, although Tikka was good in that department, too). It's very well written. I was actually laughing out loud at parts of it while I was sitting in bed reading it.
And it's really goddam dark, thematically. Man.
I'm having a plotbunny involving Rimmer and a spikey hooked Cat penis. Yeeks.
I really have to say, after reading it, I wonder about what Grant and Naylor each brought to the series. One of my main problems with VII is that many of the episodes seem to be... not-tightly-written; things go by quickly and aren't tied together well (the latter half of Epideme particularly), and that's exactly what Backwards had - that tight tie-together of events (that I think was best, TV-series-wise, in Gunmen, although Tikka was good in that department, too). It's very well written. I was actually laughing out loud at parts of it while I was sitting in bed reading it.
And it's really goddam dark, thematically. Man.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
And I learned a new word - undetumescing. So good all round then. :)