ext_28796 ([identity profile] shivvlan.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] reddwarfslash2006-06-09 12:52 pm
Entry tags:

(no subject)

This is such a retarded thing to ponder, but it's been bugging me for over a week.
In the 2nd DJ clip on YouTube, when Chris Barrie says that he and Craig Charles didn't try to turn each other on sexually cause there were 50 poeple staring at them like they were nuts...does that then imply that if there hadn't been 50 other people there they would have been trying to turn each other on sexually?
ext_3665: (chicken dance rimmer)

[identity profile] zekkass.livejournal.com 2006-06-09 01:13 am (UTC)(link)
I think he was protesting the questioners reactions to their questions. You could put that spin on his reaction, if you wanted. Also, would he have admitted to trying to turn Craig Charles on to the general public?

I honestly don't know if he was implying that he would try to turn Craig on if there hadn't been people there. I'd hope that was what he was implying, but then again, I am a slasher.

That's a good question, actually. I think we've all pondered things like that. *g*

[identity profile] roadstergal.livejournal.com 2006-06-09 02:25 am (UTC)(link)
Yes. Next? ;)

Or maybe he would have if they hadn't had clipboards.


"Chris - you have nothing to be ashamed of." -Mac

[identity profile] nessaancalime.livejournal.com 2006-06-09 06:50 am (UTC)(link)
He, I was thinking exactly the same when I watched that. Great mind thinks alike...
Of course, as said above, it was probably the rather exited reactions to his free admission there being tongues involved, that made him him want to stress that point.
But I am sure he realised that this didn't really help, after all they were asking about his job as an actor, and why should two actors want to turn each other on, unless its a porn movie :-) So he indicated instead that the idea was not alien to his own mind ::G::
There is a good English expression here: when you're in a hole, stop digging... He moved on the next question.

[identity profile] kirke-novak.livejournal.com 2006-06-09 09:54 am (UTC)(link)
Well duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuh. They are not into voyerism, that's it. Just a normal couple :D

[identity profile] pikapal101.livejournal.com 2006-07-20 07:09 am (UTC)(link)
OMG I was thinking the exact same thing when I watched it! All I can think about is if it was sorta like a closed set and there wasn't many people around... hehehe sexually turn each other on. Then again, I am a fangurl, so I have my dirty mind. *clutches the boys protectively*