(no subject)

[shivvlan.livejournal.com]

This is such a retarded thing to ponder, but it's been bugging me for over a week.
In the 2nd DJ clip on YouTube, when Chris Barrie says that he and Craig Charles didn't try to turn each other on sexually cause there were 50 poeple staring at them like they were nuts...does that then imply that if there hadn't been 50 other people there they would have been trying to turn each other on sexually?

Comments

[zekkass.livejournal.com]

I think he was protesting the questioners reactions to their questions. You could put that spin on his reaction, if you wanted. Also, would he have admitted to trying to turn Craig Charles on to the general public?

I honestly don't know if he was implying that he would try to turn Craig on if there hadn't been people there. I'd hope that was what he was implying, but then again, I am a slasher.

That's a good question, actually. I think we've all pondered things like that. *g*

[shivvlan.livejournal.com]

It just sounded like a rather freudian slip, to overlook such an implication. =P Specially to a room full of fangurls.

[zekkass.livejournal.com]

Ah, he was probably a little nervous. Discussing tongues with a room of fangirls, and what would Craig say if he saw the video?

[shivvlan.livejournal.com]

roflmao Man, now I want to show it to him >_>

[zekkass.livejournal.com]

*watches the plotbunnies rise* And what kind of conversation would he have with Chris after he saw it?

[shivvlan.livejournal.com]

"Is there something you're not tellling me, man?" >_>

heh-heh

[zekkass.livejournal.com]

"Um. No, not exactly." And then he's off explaining that there were lots of fangirls watching him, and Craig is watching him and not believing a word of it.

Now, this could go places. ;)

[shivvlan.livejournal.com]

rofl. If only i wrote RPS. Unfortunately I only read, and then only cause roadstergal and kahvi wrote it.

And it is such a good idea.

[zekkass.livejournal.com]

Hmm. I could take it, but I'm not exactly familiar with how to write Craig and Chris.

...I say the idea's up for grabs. I'll give it a go, but things could easily grind to a halt. We'll see. If your muse strikes, write.

[roadstergal.livejournal.com]

Yes. Next? ;)

Or maybe he would have if they hadn't had clipboards.


"Chris - you have nothing to be ashamed of." -Mac

[shivvlan.livejournal.com]

Rofl. I knew it!

Seriously though, who needs philosophy when we have this stuff to think about.

[kahvi.livejournal.com]

Yes, yes - it's the clipboards!

He was just totally digging himself into a hole. Why does he do that every time he starts talking about kissing Craig? Not that I'm implying anything.

At all.

[roadstergal.livejournal.com]

Yes. Now if had only been 25 people, or if they hadn't had clipboards, they would have definitely tried to turn each other on.

Here's your shovel.

[zekkass.livejournal.com]

*borrows the shovel* Now I'm going to be up all night wondering what they would have done if someone had been sick that day. Or what they did after the shooting.

[roadstergal.livejournal.com]

Now I'm going to be up all night wondering what they would have done if someone had been sick that day.

*snicker*



*hisses* "We can't sexually turn each other on! There are 50 people here with clipboards!"

*mutters in ear* "Diane is sick. There are only 49 people here."

*normal voice* "Oh, well, it's fine then."

[zekkass.livejournal.com]

Nee! Oh, if only. If only...

[zekkass.livejournal.com]

psst! Want an RPS idea? Go up on the page and see my conversation with shivvlan. The idea's open source right now. Take it if you want it.

[roadstergal.livejournal.com]

We kinda wrote a little mini-thing on that by accident... maybe we'll turn it into a vignette, if kahvi's willing.

[zekkass.livejournal.com]

I don't want to force it on you, but if you would I'd be grateful. ;)

[shivvlan.livejournal.com]

I'd be grateful too. I'm having enough trouble writing a passable Rimmer and a Lister that might possibly be prehaps from a passably close dimension to the real Lister; Craig and Chris are completely beyond me.
The idea is fetchingly sound though.

[kahvi.livejournal.com]

Accidental fic!

*giggles*

I love it when that happens. :)

(edit done soon)

[shivvlan.livejournal.com]

Accidental fiks make yje world go 'round. ;)

[shivvlan.livejournal.com]

'the'! 'the'!

[nessaancalime.livejournal.com]

He, I was thinking exactly the same when I watched that. Great mind thinks alike...
Of course, as said above, it was probably the rather exited reactions to his free admission there being tongues involved, that made him him want to stress that point.
But I am sure he realised that this didn't really help, after all they were asking about his job as an actor, and why should two actors want to turn each other on, unless its a porn movie :-) So he indicated instead that the idea was not alien to his own mind ::G::
There is a good English expression here: when you're in a hole, stop digging... He moved on the next question.

[kirke-novak.livejournal.com]

Well duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuh. They are not into voyerism, that's it. Just a normal couple :D

[roadstergal.livejournal.com]

:D Oh, yes, fer sure.

[pikapal101.livejournal.com]

OMG I was thinking the exact same thing when I watched it! All I can think about is if it was sorta like a closed set and there wasn't many people around... hehehe sexually turn each other on. Then again, I am a fangurl, so I have my dirty mind. *clutches the boys protectively*