http://janamelie.livejournal.com/ (
janamelie.livejournal.com) wrote in
reddwarfslash2015-02-08 10:10 pm
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Labels In RD Fic (Or Lack Thereof)
A comment I left on a RD slash fic on AO3 and its author's reply set me thinking about the extremely relaxed approach to labels which virtually all RD fic writers seem to have. With Michael_McGruder's permission I'm reproducing the exchange here. (You can also find a link to their fic in the first comment to this entry; I recommend the whole series it's a part of.)
Me: You know, I think this is the first time I've read the word "bisexual" in an actual RD fic as opposed to meta. Not a criticism, just an observation.
MM: Yeah, I'm not sure why everyone is so skittish about defining anyone as bisexual in fics, considering nearly 100% of them make Lister bi.
It's a good question. I'm not sure whether it's because we're usually talking about Lister rather than Rimmer. While the canonical evidence of his interest in women is undeniable (and no-one's trying to deny it) he also seems pretty likely to dislike the whole concept of labels.
Alternatively, it could be because of RD's setting and the fact that there are no humans around to make definitions necessary. Or maybe there's just something about this show which encourages a laid back, laissez-faire approach to this kind of thing, much as no-one's bothered about defining Rimmer or Lister as a top or a bottom. What do you think? :)
Me: You know, I think this is the first time I've read the word "bisexual" in an actual RD fic as opposed to meta. Not a criticism, just an observation.
MM: Yeah, I'm not sure why everyone is so skittish about defining anyone as bisexual in fics, considering nearly 100% of them make Lister bi.
It's a good question. I'm not sure whether it's because we're usually talking about Lister rather than Rimmer. While the canonical evidence of his interest in women is undeniable (and no-one's trying to deny it) he also seems pretty likely to dislike the whole concept of labels.
Alternatively, it could be because of RD's setting and the fact that there are no humans around to make definitions necessary. Or maybe there's just something about this show which encourages a laid back, laissez-faire approach to this kind of thing, much as no-one's bothered about defining Rimmer or Lister as a top or a bottom. What do you think? :)
no subject
no subject
But, there's never been a moment in any of the fics I've written where I've felt the need for any of the characters to either talk about or specifically reference what their sexualities are. I don't feel that's me tip-toeing around it though, it's just never felt particularly relevant for the stories I've written. Other people's mileage may vary. :)
There is something I've had on the backburner for months that might require some talk of sexuality once I start fleshing it out, but I'll have to wait and see what happens, once I start actually writing it.
no subject
Given that it takes him all of part of an episode to declare himself a "working class hero" after learning who his real father is in "The Beginning" I can easily imagine him wanting to define his sexuality too if he started a relationship with Lister. He might even read books about it and come up with his own original label. *Possible fic bunny* :)
Veronica_Rich wrote something like that regarding his new class status (in his own mind). Rimmer feels more comfortable when he has something to cling to.