Making sense of "Back to Earth"
Mar. 25th, 2010 02:24 am![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Yeah, I know that subject line is kind of an oxymoron, since making sense out of a sitcom is probably being ambitious, but I can't help trying to figure things out. *G*
Since this is a slash community, I'm curious about your take on the Lister and Rimmer relationship and changes between the series and this movie. (Note: I'm going through old posts, still, and I'm certain you longtime members have already hashed all this out, but I haven't gotten quite up to 2009 yet - and at any rate, who's likely to go back that far and look at any question a n00b might ask in the comments to any relevant entries?)
It's plain that Lister is unhappy, or dissatisfied at least, by the events of BTE. I have not read/listened to any creator remarks as to why this would be, so forgive me if this has been explained by the canon sources - but I'm guessing it's probably mostly down to having been stuck out in deep space for over 20 (conscious) years, which would be nearly half of Lister's life - and not only stuck on a ship, away from his home, but with very few companions. There aren't many of us who could have all our daily social needs satisfied by just five people (if you count Holly - speaking of which, why wasn't a Holly around in BTE? Hmm ...).
What I found interesting was the argument he and Rimmer have following the diving-bell incident. I know it's mostly written for laughs - "oh, look, here's Rimmer being a jerk yet again and failing to see how his actions left the others in needless danger" - but since it's my right as a fan to look for things in the source material and interpret them in various ways, I guess I'll try. *G* The wording is what struck me as interesting:
(paraphrasing from memory) Rimmer: Is this about you, again? Can't you see I need some "me" time?
This seems terribly callous, but if Lister's been moping around for a while, maybe it's possible Rimmer's been doing what has worked in the past to bust him out of a funk - and instead of working, it's just been contributing to the "sameness" of Lister's annoying life, which has in turn become irritating to Rimmer? (Although it can't be all thunderclouds and rainshowers for Lister, if he can plan that elaborate tomato prank and get such a kick out of it.) Lister's always been the cheerful one, and I can imagine it would really throw a spanner (pun not intended) in the works of how Rimmer sees things if Lister becomes the depressed one.
Also, what's the deal with Kochanski, anyway? We can figure Lister's not wholly depressed because of her death/departure - I mean, the whole reason she left was to get away from him being like that. (a) If he was with her, why would he be depressed? It's half his lifelong dream, supposedly. (b) If he WASN'T with her, why did he not make some sort of move in all those years she was aboard, and then suddenly decide he wanted to get her back? (That bit sort of screwed me up, too - he's depressed being on Red Dwarf with just the guys, stuck out in deep space, but he chooses to go back to that when he could stay in the "alternate reality" with a Kochanski - it's not like the one he's pursuing is the original pinball-smile anyway, right? - and kids, and Earth, and such?)
Anyway, I hope at least someone hasn't already discussed this to death previously and will chat back at me. :-D
Since this is a slash community, I'm curious about your take on the Lister and Rimmer relationship and changes between the series and this movie. (Note: I'm going through old posts, still, and I'm certain you longtime members have already hashed all this out, but I haven't gotten quite up to 2009 yet - and at any rate, who's likely to go back that far and look at any question a n00b might ask in the comments to any relevant entries?)
It's plain that Lister is unhappy, or dissatisfied at least, by the events of BTE. I have not read/listened to any creator remarks as to why this would be, so forgive me if this has been explained by the canon sources - but I'm guessing it's probably mostly down to having been stuck out in deep space for over 20 (conscious) years, which would be nearly half of Lister's life - and not only stuck on a ship, away from his home, but with very few companions. There aren't many of us who could have all our daily social needs satisfied by just five people (if you count Holly - speaking of which, why wasn't a Holly around in BTE? Hmm ...).
What I found interesting was the argument he and Rimmer have following the diving-bell incident. I know it's mostly written for laughs - "oh, look, here's Rimmer being a jerk yet again and failing to see how his actions left the others in needless danger" - but since it's my right as a fan to look for things in the source material and interpret them in various ways, I guess I'll try. *G* The wording is what struck me as interesting:
(paraphrasing from memory) Rimmer: Is this about you, again? Can't you see I need some "me" time?
This seems terribly callous, but if Lister's been moping around for a while, maybe it's possible Rimmer's been doing what has worked in the past to bust him out of a funk - and instead of working, it's just been contributing to the "sameness" of Lister's annoying life, which has in turn become irritating to Rimmer? (Although it can't be all thunderclouds and rainshowers for Lister, if he can plan that elaborate tomato prank and get such a kick out of it.) Lister's always been the cheerful one, and I can imagine it would really throw a spanner (pun not intended) in the works of how Rimmer sees things if Lister becomes the depressed one.
Also, what's the deal with Kochanski, anyway? We can figure Lister's not wholly depressed because of her death/departure - I mean, the whole reason she left was to get away from him being like that. (a) If he was with her, why would he be depressed? It's half his lifelong dream, supposedly. (b) If he WASN'T with her, why did he not make some sort of move in all those years she was aboard, and then suddenly decide he wanted to get her back? (That bit sort of screwed me up, too - he's depressed being on Red Dwarf with just the guys, stuck out in deep space, but he chooses to go back to that when he could stay in the "alternate reality" with a Kochanski - it's not like the one he's pursuing is the original pinball-smile anyway, right? - and kids, and Earth, and such?)
Anyway, I hope at least someone hasn't already discussed this to death previously and will chat back at me. :-D
no subject
Date: 2010-03-25 07:26 am (UTC)In the first scene with the tomato prank, Rimmer berates Lister, asking him whether it was worth spending hours of planning for just a few seconds of pleasure.
And then comes my tragic mishearing which has skewed my entire reading of the specials.
Lister: Sounds like the last time *we* had sex
GAH.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-25 07:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-25 10:26 am (UTC)/lies on back, looking up at gutter. sigh.
I think Kochanski probably left because in the end Lister just wasn't her Dave. They were together, though, because if they weren't and he's still pining over her solely because of what they had all those years ago... that just strikes me as way too pathetic even for him.
The fact that BtE is still so like old Dwarf is both a blessing and a curse; it's a blessing because it's the dynamic we love, and it's a curse because while we saw plenty of character growth over the original run of the show, it seems like nothing's really happened in those nine years. Which of course it hasn't, because it's all been handwaved away. It gives us plenty of room to speculate, but it's hard to speculate when we've only been dropped a few hints. I mean, hell, even the beginnings of 'Backwards', 'Psirens' and 'Tikka to Ride' in their own ways had some sort of explanation. Then all of a sudden with BtE it's nine years later and there's a Mary Sue on board being a bossy bitch.
The trouble is that while RD continuity can be hilariously nonexistent, this time it's frustrating, because while we can throw out all sorts of mad speculation, the actual plot growth is harder to pin down. Granted, I'm glad that BtE wasn't all infodump, and I thought that explaining Holly and Kochanski's absences was reasonably well done, but there're so many more 'what ifs' in there that need to be worked out.
But this is why we have fanfic, of course.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-25 10:55 am (UTC)/lies on back, looking up at gutter. sigh.
Tee-hee
no subject
Date: 2010-03-25 03:52 pm (UTC)I think Kochanski probably left because in the end Lister just wasn't her Dave. They were together, though, because if they weren't and he's still pining over her solely because of what they had all those years ago... that just strikes me as way too pathetic even for him.
There was a time that Rimmer used to basically tell him the same thing, perhaps before he became more self-aware and realized his own pathetic shortcomings and maybe felt like he didn't have any room to talk about THAT. Or, it's an agreement they have - Lister doesn't mention gazpacho soup, Rimmer doesn't editorialize about the Kochanski Dream.
I wonder if Naylor really is going to produce a season 9 and 10 to explain the holes .....
no subject
Date: 2010-09-15 07:35 am (UTC)I saw bte on my time netbook on a plane (on my honeymoon!) so I couldn't tell if it was a hard or soft light Rimmer and it seemed to flick between the two (he used the skutters in one scene, but picked something up the next) so I decided that Ace's light-bee had been damaged and switched randomly between modes and that's why he had to retire.
It fits okay enough for me.
The other alternative is that Listernever got over loosing two Rimmers, although he never realised that was what was wrong. He ended up driving Krissie away te way people do when they are hurt about something they can't face) or perhaps he couldn't be close to her out of a deep-seated fear he'd loose her as well (wich sems to have been realised).
Or, hell, what if Holly was originally right and Rimmer really was the one person who could keep Lister sane and loosing him puhd him off the deep end a bit and Kochanski couldn't deal with that. That could be the impetus for Holly to reboot another Rimmer?
I actually like the possibilities.
no subject
Date: 2010-09-15 03:50 pm (UTC)Did you notice when Lister was at the memorium in BTE talking to Kochanski's photo, there was also a photo of the original Rimmer?
no subject
Date: 2010-03-25 07:53 am (UTC)*nods* A very interesting reading. Me likey. Fic?
no subject
Date: 2010-03-25 08:00 am (UTC)/eyes plotbunny pile with trepidation
no subject
Date: 2010-03-25 01:59 pm (UTC)And Lister misses the point entirely.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-25 03:43 pm (UTC)Do you think Lister ever took Rimmer seriously? (He seems to once in a while in the series, but I'm not sure if it's a long-term thing at all.) And if so, when do you think he stopped?
no subject
Date: 2010-03-25 05:01 pm (UTC)I think Lister takes certain things about Rimmer seriously. Nothing that was in this sory arc, though.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-25 05:19 pm (UTC)However, I don't believe that and neither do you, I'm sure. :-P
Unfortunately, I know what it's like to be in such a deep depression that nothing matters but the pit you yourself are in - you don't worry about how friends and family feel very much, you don't pay much attention to their well-being or concern, and you can be slow to care about *anything*. Lister exhibits all of these qualities in BTE - not that I can blame him, he's in a depressive situation, IMO. Possibly Rimmer deliberately pisses him off in the diving bell and after he knows he's safe again, because he's trying to get any strong reaction - even anger.
And yeah, it is kind of sad that he doesn't defend himself better to Kremlin Kate. (HAHA I love that nickname, almost as much as I love Kryten's line and delivery after the bus hits her - "She didn't see that coming? I did.") But if he feels guilty that he hasn't done his job well, he might not be able to marshal a defense. Nevermind that it's not his fault Lister is depressed - Rimmer is a master of blaming, himself as well as others, even when there's no place to put blame.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-27 09:19 am (UTC)I like to think that he never sorted things out with Kochanski because he never wanted to completely close the door on the possibility of something with Rimmer. He didn't have the guts to choose between them, so Kriss made the decision for him. But, as has always been the case throughout the shows history, they've still never been able to admit how they feel, leaving them both angry, frustrated and depressed.
One of the best cut-scenes from BTE is of Lister and Rimmer talking about jammy dodgers. It starts with Lister reminiscing about a sexual encounter with Kochanski and how he now accosiates jammy dodgers with sex. He tells Rimmer he found the last jammy dodger onboard and although it was a bit old and manky he was still thrilled when he found it. Rimmer askes in disgust if he eat it and Lister says earnestly, 'No, I gave it to you. I know how much you like them.' QED, methinks. And the look on Rimmer's face, torn between disgust and tenderness says it all.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-27 03:17 pm (UTC)I wondered if that was just him using a colloquialism to drive home the fact he doesn't believe Lister would ever have a chance with her. Plus, she actually did dump him once, they do have a "past" as it were, so maybe he felt her leaving at all was dumping? I dunno. *G*
He didn't have the guts to choose between them, so Kriss made the decision for him.
Something
and how he now accosiates jammy dodgers with sex ... Rimmer askes in disgust if he eat it and Lister says earnestly, 'No, I gave it to you. I know how much you like them.' QED, methinks.
Oh, that is just too precious for words. (Yeah, I'm a girl.) I wish I could see that bit, it sounds like great insight. (Question: What is a jammy dodger, anyway? I'm not British. I know cellophane-wrapped Twinkies would probably survive for three million years, though, LOL.)
One thing I've wondered is, do you know which creator apparently set this whole Lister/Rimmer idea in motion? Was it both Naylor and Grant, or just Naylor (seeing as he's the one left and there's still no real shortage of a slashy vibe)? Or did it totally come from the actors' interaction onscreen and was dovetailed back into canon by perceptive writers?
no subject
Date: 2010-03-27 08:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-27 10:08 pm (UTC)Oh, that's the whole purpose of fandom. Adds that extra layer of fun. Look at the decades of good time fanboys have had with all the stuff Lucas never intended in "Star Wars" too. *G* And, RD is a comedy. First and foremost, that's what I always liked about it.
BUT - writers and creators can still make a conscious decision to push one thing over another. That's just what I meant. (Plus, I was always struck by just how ... non-sexual-tension the whole dynamic between Lister and Kochanski was in the last two seasons. You'd think UST would be bursting out all over the place, but at least I didn't feel it, for comedy or otherwise. *shrug*) Though, I DID like their dynamic - Chloe actually fit in with the gang surprisingly well, I thought, for being a late addition.