You know what annoys me about S8?
Nov. 9th, 2013 12:26 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Well, aside from "Krytie TV". It's the fact that Hollister had Rimmer enter the psychotropic testing without his knowledge. The other four had to sign consent forms, acknowledge that they understood what was going to happen to them and agreed to be placed in the AR environment. Rimmer was just told to lick an envelope that was posted to himself.
I know Rimmer represented himself at his trial, but it never should have come to that, or his entire case thrown out on the basis of entrapment. Nothing he said or did in the AR environment should have been allowed as evidence, which means that Hollister would have had to prove another way that Rimmer was using confidential files for his personal gain. And if Rimmer had a shred of self-preservation (and we know he has it in spades), he might have been able to keep it to himself or at least slide by without being overt. I don't know; that one part has always bugged me.
I know Rimmer represented himself at his trial, but it never should have come to that, or his entire case thrown out on the basis of entrapment. Nothing he said or did in the AR environment should have been allowed as evidence, which means that Hollister would have had to prove another way that Rimmer was using confidential files for his personal gain. And if Rimmer had a shred of self-preservation (and we know he has it in spades), he might have been able to keep it to himself or at least slide by without being overt. I don't know; that one part has always bugged me.
no subject
Date: 2013-11-09 08:32 pm (UTC)But also the fluctuating IQ of our fave characters according to the demands of the plot, which ties into your point. WHY do the crew elect to represent themselves? And if they must, why doesn't Kochanski, who let's face it would have more credibility in the eyes of the court thanks to being an officer, take a more active role instead of leaving the talking to Cat of all people?
I think this is why Doug changed Hollister's character to an unscrupulous charlatan - to make it more believable that he would set Rimmer up like that. No explanation is given as to why he's so determined to imprison them. Unless he sees their superior knowledge of what happened regarding the nanobots as a threat to his own position as Captain?
no subject
Date: 2013-11-09 09:49 pm (UTC)This is one of the major things for me, even setting aside other continuity and characterisation issues. I think it's partly why I'm one of the few people who admits to liking 8, and I always have to qualify it with a bazillion disclaimers.
no subject
Date: 2013-11-09 10:10 pm (UTC)Oh well. We can still like problematic things.
And getting back to Kronette's original point, Rimmer does get an even worse deal than the others, but I suppose we're meant to see it as payback for his betrayal of the others. And possibly for his unscrupulous use of the sexual magnetism virus. *Ponders*
no subject
Date: 2013-11-10 01:24 am (UTC)There are so many things wrong with 8 that, it's just not as fun to watch as The first 6, BTE, and X.
no subject
Date: 2013-11-10 02:01 am (UTC)I know Lister also tries it on Kochanski in AR, but it's presented as a spur of the moment thing and doesn't get very far. Not that I'm exonerating him either.
Oh hell, let's just blame Doug's writing. Although how he goes from showing Arlene's rapey attitude in "Parallel Universe" as wrong to - this, I'm not sure. :/
no subject
Date: 2013-11-10 03:27 am (UTC)The whole thing is just bad. Bad bad bad. I forgive S8 for one reason; naked Rimmer and Lister.
no subject
Date: 2013-11-10 06:22 pm (UTC)The Dennis the donut boy was a really stupid idea, anyway. Unless the JMC really is that stupid an entity, which is entirely possible. But...that clearly wasn't in his files, because Rimmer READ THEM ALREADY. He brought the muffin and the pile cream specifically because of what he'd found in the captain's files. There was nothing about his rise in ranks in there, clearly, because Rimmer would have tried to weasel a promotion out of the captain that way. No, nothing explains it. Not really, and not well.
no subject
Date: 2013-11-10 04:31 pm (UTC)For this reason, I could accept the seemingly radical change in Hollister's character. Finding themselves three million years outside of the boundaries of civilization seems to give him and people like Ackerman more reason to act in ways they deem fit as opposed to what would have been appropriate or acceptable before the accident -- hence the entrapment, hence the pitiful kangaroo court, hence hanging charges that essentially only apply to Lister and Rimmer to the rest of the 'bug crew.
Regarding consent and lack of same in series 8... the 23rd century doesn't seem like much of an enlightened place if the threat of rape is still a joke or where having your ability to consent tampered with due to exposure to the effects of a "sexual magnetism virus" *isn't* the equivalent of being roofied. And I don't know whether to say that it's a recurring problem in Doug's writing or a more widespread problem in media narratives (as you said, the writers of "Buffy" didn't think too hard about it either).
no subject
Date: 2013-11-10 06:17 pm (UTC)What I'm struggling with in a story, is regarding the virus and Lister dumping it over Rimmer. Rimmer wasn't affected by the virus, at least not directly. He said something about being wanted was like an aphrodesiac, with a lion's sexual appetite. But what if one person dragged him away from the prisoners, but they were affected? Rimmer could have tried to stop them, but with his state of mind after the prisoners started to turn on him, would he have? Is it considered rape by Rimmer if he has sex with someone while they're under the influence, but he didn't infect them? Or is it rape by the person affected by the virus, because Rimmer couldn't say no? Or do we take it out of the 'real world' and say that sex pollen/virus made them do it?
That is my dilemma. I don't know how to classify it, or if I should even try. Damn you, Doug!!
no subject
Date: 2013-11-10 07:12 pm (UTC)Oh, hell. *Sticks fingers in ears and tells self that the guards stopped the prisoners and then the virus wore off* :(
I suggest going with "The virus made them do it".
no subject
Date: 2013-11-10 07:16 pm (UTC)I'm writing a fix, don't worry. *pats on shoulder* That's why I'm trying to work out the cause/effect/issues surrounding the use of the virus.
no subject
Date: 2013-11-10 07:13 pm (UTC)I think that could have easily been one underlying motive, considering how poorly the *ship's psychiatrist* reacted to the idea. But, like you said, if Doug had at least hinted at that in Hollister's intros or his conversation with Holly, it would have lent a lot more credibility to the plot.
The whole virus is problematic for me. In this specific scenario, in the event of Rimmer being rescued in the prison by someone who is then exposed to the virus, if he's aware that it's the virus that is causing all of this to happen, I think any idea of consent is void and it then becomes his responsibility to put a stop to it. If he can. But you're right -- if he can't stop it and says "no," is the person reacting to the virus guilty of assault or is Lister (since he was the one that dosed Rimmer in the first place)?
no subject
Date: 2013-11-10 07:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-11-10 05:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-11-10 06:07 pm (UTC)The original charges as I found them listed in a script online: David Lister, you are formally charged with stealing and crashing a Starbug. You are also charged with having no pilot's license, and smuggling two stowaways on board, along with Navigation Officer Kristine Kochanski. Anything you say now, or do not say now, may be used at a board of enquiry against you. Do you require any form of aid?
However, as they went through the AR, Hollister and SaneHolly found them not guilty of all those charges, but then said that they'd obviously seen the crew confidential files, which was a serious charge and they were all guilty. Except they weren't - only Lister and Rimmer deliberately looked at the files (Lister 6 years previous when the crew was wiped out). And how can InsaneHolly be brought up on charges? He's the damn computer! Because he let Dave originally see the files, which enabled Lister to copy them to disk, which let Rimmer get them? Complete and utter horseshit.
*rageface* If we didn't love our show so much, it wouldn't annoy us so much, right?
no subject
Date: 2013-11-11 07:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-11-12 01:45 am (UTC)YES! We went 7 years without a part 2 (not counting Emohawk), then we had a 3-parter and a 2-parter in the same series. I think it happened with Doug with BTE as well. It wasn't supposed to be a three parter, but rather an hour special which dragged out. He needs someone to tighten the scripts, check for errors/plot holes that Starbug could traverse, things like that.
A definite, clear idea for a main story that works within the time frame allotted should be the goal. I'm still amazed at what they crammed into "Gunmen." Talk about an incredibly tight, well done episode and hardly anything trimmed from the shot footage.
no subject
Date: 2013-11-12 08:10 pm (UTC)