Books question
Jun. 26th, 2010 12:14 am![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
veronica-rich.livejournal.com posting in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
reddwarfslash*raises hand*
Okay, another question about the novels, specifically the last two. I was reading the IMDB message board for RD and there was a thread on the books - the commenter said "The Last Human" is NOT a sequel to "Backwards," but instead, that each book is that particular writer's sequel to their last joint novel, "Better Than Life."
I post this here for two reasons. One, you guys are the best bunch of discussers (and the only ones I'm familiar with so far) of Red Dwarf, generally. Second, there's an element of possible slashiness here, I suppose. TLH ends with Lister and Kochanski getting busy recreating the human race, Rimmer dead and his son still alive (and somewhere out there, I sure hope somebody's written an OT3 - not a triangle - with Lister/Kochanski/McGruder just on principle *G*). "Backwards" ends with teenage Lister and the Cat escaping a universe where Kryten and Rimmer have been killed, into an alternate dimension where Lister and the Cat had died. (No Kochanski in sight; that was handled at the beginning of the novel.)
Is this true, that each is just a sequel to BTL? Have you ever heard this - is it common knowledge and I'm just the ignoramus? Or is it untrue?
Oh, and if they're each a BTL sequel, I suppose the question becomes, what does this say for each writer's vision of the R/L relationship? Just to keep it more on-topic.
Okay, another question about the novels, specifically the last two. I was reading the IMDB message board for RD and there was a thread on the books - the commenter said "The Last Human" is NOT a sequel to "Backwards," but instead, that each book is that particular writer's sequel to their last joint novel, "Better Than Life."
I post this here for two reasons. One, you guys are the best bunch of discussers (and the only ones I'm familiar with so far) of Red Dwarf, generally. Second, there's an element of possible slashiness here, I suppose. TLH ends with Lister and Kochanski getting busy recreating the human race, Rimmer dead and his son still alive (and somewhere out there, I sure hope somebody's written an OT3 - not a triangle - with Lister/Kochanski/McGruder just on principle *G*). "Backwards" ends with teenage Lister and the Cat escaping a universe where Kryten and Rimmer have been killed, into an alternate dimension where Lister and the Cat had died. (No Kochanski in sight; that was handled at the beginning of the novel.)
Is this true, that each is just a sequel to BTL? Have you ever heard this - is it common knowledge and I'm just the ignoramus? Or is it untrue?
Oh, and if they're each a BTL sequel, I suppose the question becomes, what does this say for each writer's vision of the R/L relationship? Just to keep it more on-topic.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2010-06-27 11:06 am (UTC)I think it helps that there's more to show him as being heroic rather than telling us (the show's time limitations mean he ends up being the one who informs us of most of his attributes, which sort of works against say, his modesty. Things like the 'I'll be with the salt of the earth engineers rather than the admiral's party' are amusing, but they're pretty clunky exposition, and while obviously the viewer knows that it's aimed at them, the in-character reasons for bringing up that sort of stuff would seem more egotistical.)
I also find Rimmer and the crew to be slightly out of character in Dimension Jump - Rimmer's far more irritating than usual in that episode (quite a feat, lol) but the crew also do stuff they wouldn't normally (Cat being two-faced rather than openly rude to Rimmer sticks out, but also the whole fishing holiday thing.) whereas in Backwards, he seems more normal level annoying, heh.
BUT, you have to admit even that point from "Dimension Jump" was jossed by SMAC, where it was basically immplied that every Rimmer ends up dying as Ace and every Ace has the same personality. And wasn't that particulary plot point all on Naylor?
Oh, definitely, SMAC's got a ton of issues of its own! Both Naylor and Grant seemed to go back and forth on alt-personalities and whether to make a point with them (the various Aces - isn't there also a SMAC deleted scene with the Ace training 'our' Rimmer being one who left his crew and took the time drive in 'Out of Time'?, S7!Kochanski) or else just use them as replacements (book!Kochanskis, the end of 'Backwards', Nano!Rimmer - although, actually, I really like him, the consensus seems to be he doesn't match up to Holo!Rimmer, but I think that's a problem inherent with the entire show and it's style at that point rather than a specific characterisation issue. The ways he differs seem to be entirely in keeping with his changes in circumstances, and I think it's fascinating how he and Lister's relationship alters in that series.)