[identity profile] janamelie.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] reddwarfslash
We all have them, but some are more deeply entrenched than others.  The recent plethora of BDSM fic (thank you, Kronette and Felineranger) made me realise that I have problems imagining Lister as a natural, dyed in the wool submissive, which *spoiler* is a major aspect of "Lessons In Heroics", even though it's an alternate version of him.

(Kronette, this is not a criticism of your fic in any way.  You can write whatever the hell you like and I'm finding the story riveting regardless.) :)

Those who are following this story will know that, on the list of disquieting aspects, an alternate version of Lister being an enthusiastic sub is so far down it shouldn't even register, but somehow it does for me.  I think it's because his usual character is so anti rules and regulations that it's hard to imagine BDSM being a fundamental part of his sexuality.  Which isn't to say I can't see him enjoying it (as in "FSOS") but enjoying and needing are different.

I apologise in advance if my ramblings offend anyone.  I don't mean to imply that there's anything wrong with being a natural sub or Dom, just that it's not how I interpret his character.  I can imagine either of Rimmer though.

Does anyone else have head canons which you thought were casual until you read a fic which contradicted them?

Date: 2014-10-07 10:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kahvi.livejournal.com
As you know, I'm totally with you on the subby Lister thing. :)

For me though, it's Rimmer's sexuality. I've mentioned it before, but I find it really hard to imagine him as anything other than gay or asexual (and if so, homoromantic). And it simply didn't occur to me that anyone would think otherwise until I came across fic in which he happily is attracted to women. And before anyone mentions him happily being attracted to women in canon, well, no, we see him having SEX with women in canon, and doing a whole lot of what I personally have always seen as obviously "protesting too much". But I won't get into an essay about that here. *looks around* Unless anyone wants me to. :p

Date: 2014-10-07 11:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kahvi.livejournal.com
Well, that's just it - cared for. Of course he cared for her, but I have such a hard time seeing that affection as sexual or romantic. Even if I had seen the character as having any sort of attraction to women.

Not to go off on a tangent - though I suppose it's still perfectly on topic - LONG before I was into slash or even fic; when I first saw that episode as a child, and later as a young teen, the idea that Rimmer would somehow fall in love with Nirvanah that quickly never sat right with me. I distinctly remember being utterly annoyed by the implication. So I think it's clear that it can't be love, though I'm equally certain that someone like Rimmer, so canonically inexperienced and uncertain about his identity on so many levels, and so eager to be normal and conform, might see it that way.

Hee, I'll see what I come up with. :)

Date: 2014-10-08 02:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] veronica-rich.livejournal.com
If I've learned anything in 30 years of fandoms, it's that if there's something you can't imagine a character doing, someone else will. That's just the way of humans. ;-)

Date: 2014-10-07 10:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rosecathy1.livejournal.com
It does surprise me a bit when Rimmer is portrayed like he's never even considered the concept two men being together. My interpretation of Rimmer's canonical homophobia/sissyphobia is that since it's mostly (all?) aimed at Ace, it's a manifestation of pettiness and jealousy. You could also argue that he's in denial about some aspect of his own sexuality. However, I don't take all this to be a reflection of his overall worldview. There was the (admittedly unused and throwaway) reference in The End to a gay couple, to which all Rimmer said was "I think they split up before they died", not "ew, they were gay, why", and this was when his characterisation was in its infancy, i.e., as a total bastard.

As for the D/S issue, while I have my own take, it doesn't usually bother me when someone writes an opposing interpretation. Personalities outside the bedroom can be and are often deceiving; certain experiences, rather than traits, might be correlated with certain preferences, maybe. Also, there are degrees of dominance and submission. Even the Lister in Heroics is submissive primarily in terms of romance and sex, not so much in other areas like some who are in 24/7 arrangements, so I don't see his submission as particularly regulation-based. This is my reading, of course, and [livejournal.com profile] kronette might have something different in mind.

Date: 2014-10-08 06:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lordvalerymimes.livejournal.com
Could you explain this Sam Murray business janamelie? I don't have the show on DVD so I've missed out on a lot of background information and extras. Just curious what the cut scene was?

Date: 2014-10-07 11:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kahvi.livejournal.com
Oh, here's another, very boring one: It's always DAVID Lister, to me. Not Dave. That may be my background; we don't use abbreviated names in Scandinavia; if you learn that someone's name is a particular thing, it feels odd to refer to them as anything else. But I don't think it's that; not really (I use an abbreviation for my own name with English speakers, so you know...) - I think it's more that "Dave" feels like something someone who doesn't know him well enough would assume he wants to be called. It makes sense for Holly to call him that, but notably, Petersen doesn't. Again, that could be related to the above, but, well. That's a deep-set fanon/headcanon thing for me; I would never consider having Rimmer call him Dave. :p

Date: 2014-10-08 12:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rosecathy1.livejournal.com
Doesn't Lister refer to himself as Dave? Other people...I think Chen/Selby calls him Dave in Back in the Red, and Kochanski2 always calls him Dave, which he accepts (and there's "Will you stop calling your boyfriend Dave? I'M Dave. He's the anti-Lister."). Whether Rimmer would call him Dave...eh. In a romantic context, I see it working as a sporadic pet name.

Date: 2014-10-08 06:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kahvi.livejournal.com
Well, like I said to Vero below, it's not really about which name he is most often called, or even which name he claims to prefer. It's more about what I feel the names represent in different contexts. And as you point out, who says it matters too.

Date: 2014-10-08 12:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] felineranger.livejournal.com
Book!canon suggests that he prefers Dave. In Last Human he tells Kochanski not to call him David. It also tends to be how he refers to himself throughout the show.

Date: 2014-10-08 06:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kahvi.livejournal.com
That isn't really the impression I was left with, but then again, like I said below, it's not really about frequency of usage; it's about what I feel the names represents. What I'm getting at is that "Dave Lister" is a slightly different person, in Lister's mind, than "David Lister" and he likes and dislikes both, for various reasons. But to me, "David Lister" is closer to who he "really" is. That's a terrible explanation, lol.

Date: 2014-10-08 06:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] veronica-rich.livejournal.com
While canon suggests "Dave" is preferred, to be fair, it also suggests "Arnold" is preferred ... and I just can't do it. I much prefer Arn or Arnie, or something else. Especially since I write mainly romance-related with the character. "Arnold" is about as sexy and appealing as dish soap. (People named Arnold can calm the hell right down, because I feel the same way about "Gary" since it's my dad's name.)

Date: 2014-10-08 06:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kahvi.livejournal.com
I was struggling to formulate a reply to all of the above, and here you go, taking the words right out of my mouth. This isn't really about looking at canonical evidence of who calls him what and how often, it's more a gut feeling based on the impressions I've gotten from the show in general.

Also, it's not really about what Lister prefers to be called, but rather what I feel the names represent to him consciously or not. And who says it matters. I'm not sure if that's any clearer than what Vero said much more succinctly. :p

Date: 2014-10-08 06:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lordvalerymimes.livejournal.com
I can't think of them calling one another anything but Lister and Rimmer. Maybe it's unrealistic especially since I know Rimmer doesn't like his last name, but I just can't HEAR them any other way. My fanwank explanation for my own fics is that Rimmer loves Lister so much that he actually starts to LIKE how his name sounds when it comes from Lister's lips. :D

Date: 2014-10-08 09:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kahvi.livejournal.com
No, I do that too. It's not unrealistic at all; it's what they call one another, it's their names for one another. Names are important, and interesting (to me, certainly, as I'm sure is overtly evident by now :p). Lister calling Rimmer "Rimmer" is different from other people calling him that. That's even lampshaded in canon; "Rimmer, to rhyme with scum." And I suppose, to Rimmer, reclaiming something that was forced upon him - his name - might be a good thing. I personally don't think Rimmer minds either way what people call him, TBH. So long as it's actually his name. ;)

Date: 2014-10-08 07:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nice-girls-play.livejournal.com
Well, Rimmer does call him David after being drained in "Polymorph."

Date: 2014-10-08 08:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] veronica-rich.livejournal.com
Oh, and then Davy-Boy in Emohawk! A LOT. (I'm sorry, but the way being "Ace" gives Rimmer leave to fawn and hover over Lister with such unabashed adoration in Emohawk will forever be one of my favorite things about Series 6, LOL.)
Edited Date: 2014-10-08 08:21 pm (UTC)

Date: 2014-10-08 09:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nice-girls-play.livejournal.com
It really is adorable! And just a bit scary how quick Rimmer is to sacrifice himself (and Cat!) to spare Lister getting attacked by the Emohawk.

Date: 2014-10-09 08:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lordvalerymimes.livejournal.com
Just echoing this. And Lister's returning, "What a guy!" adoration back at Ace. :D

Date: 2014-10-08 07:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nice-girls-play.livejournal.com
I think for me, Lister is very adaptable to whoever he's with but also someone that strays very far from extremes. He pings my "switch" button hard, so I can see him (and have written him) subbing in a D/s situation, but not exclusively and not all the time. I don't think he's the type of person who would thrive in a 24/7 or total power exchange situation either as a Dom or a sub.

As for having my headcanon fucked with -- well, the big example I have comes from Doug Naylor. Before Duct Soup, I always saw Lister as having a "whatever" attitude towards gender and just being attracted to whoever he was attracted to. I still don't see him as having or even considering a monosexual identity but his attitude about it is probably not as conscious or as nuanced as I, the viewer (who is also writer, who is also a queer woman), would like it to be. I don't think he would see himself as being "romantically attracted to multiple genders," so much as just Romantic.

He's got this wonderful nurturing instinct that he turns on just about everyone apart from Kochanski, coupled with an odd insecurity around people he's apparently infatuated with (Kochanski). The infatuations themselves appear to have little staying power when matched against caring for someone he likes (I know they're bunked in different cell blocks, but look how quickly the fixation on Kochanski stalls when he has a Rimmer to irritate in series VIII) and, instead, thrive in a vacuum such as the one created by the physical absence of that person (for that matter, he dreams about kissing Rimmer after Rimmer's gone).

Date: 2014-10-09 08:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lordvalerymimes.livejournal.com
Nurturing is a perfect word for Lister. I've yet to write any fics about Lister's pregnancy, but I vow to one day.

Date: 2014-10-10 05:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lordvalerymimes.livejournal.com
Is her stuff on AO3? I don't know that I've read any of it, I'm not recognizing the username.

Date: 2014-10-17 04:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lordvalerymimes.livejournal.com
Just started reading Planet Leave, thanks for recommending it. It's very funny! :)

Date: 2014-10-09 08:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lordvalerymimes.livejournal.com
Yes, Lister's being uncomfortable with the idea of an alternate version of himself being gay didn't seem to really jibe with the Lister we'd grown to love. Also his fawning over Kochanski never sat well with me. He's far too charismatic, confident and cocky to realistically believe he'd be so fixated on a woman he only dated for WEEKS who wound up dumping him.

I just pretend that a lot of things in series VII didn't happen. Apart from Lister's long johns.

Date: 2014-10-10 05:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lordvalerymimes.livejournal.com
"This may be a case of the actor's natural confidence and charisma clashing with the writing of his character."

This exactly. I think as the show progressed they allowed Craig's natural charisma to mold the character of Lister a bit more. He started off being so much more of a bum, but became quite cool as the show progressed.

Chris is gorgeous in my eyes, but I can see where people who go for the more typical type of a "heartthrob" ie: Brad Pitt, George Clooney, Channing Tatum sorts, wouldn't get what we see in him. Chris is good-looking, but not in a conventional way. Plus he was quite skinny at the start of the series which didn't really jibe with the stereotypical "hunky" thing that was considered attractive in the late 80s early 90s. Not everyone who looks at those flaring nostrils goes weak in the knees. ;-)

I sure do though.

Date: 2014-10-08 09:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] felineranger.livejournal.com
My take on Lister's sexuality is kind of complicated, in that I usually write him within the 'submissive' role in fic but don't actually consider him a submissive person. I can see him being very experimental though, and willing to try a lot of different things, including both aspects of D/S to a degree.

See, as in many things, Lister and Rimmer are polar opposites. Rimmer craves power and authority because he's spent his whole life being pushed down, whereas Lister I think shies away from serious responsibility because he's had to look after himself from a relatively young age. Rimmer has the desire to lead but not the capability, Lister has the capability but not the desire.

Let's look at Lister's early fantasy of marriage to Kochanski as an example. She was going to wear a white dress and ride the horses and he would take care of everything else. Because why wouldn't he? He always has. As the series goes on, it is always Lister who has to step up, always him who takes charge. He does it automatically. In Rimmerworld, we're told that he has been hiding the severity of their situation from his crewmates, even going so far as to rig the readouts so they won't worry. He doesn't have to, but he takes it on himself to shoulder the responsibility alone. Because he doesn't trust anyone else.

If Lister has any kind of submissive desires, that's where they stem from. Not necessarily wanting someone to dominate him, but wanting someone to look after him. He has a hard time admitting it, and even harder time trusting someone enough to let them do it, but once he reaches that point he becomes almost childlike. Take his relationship with Kryten for example - he starts out being very reluctant to let Kryten do ANYTHING for him. By the time we hit S7, Kryten has become a fully fledged mother figure, even cutting up his toast 'just like you asked for, Sir'. When given the opportunity, Lister regresses to a blanket-wrapped, video game playing overgrown kid. With the right person, in the right circumstances, if he felt truly safe, I think Lister could be very submissive. He just needs the right person to lift that weight off his shoulders.

Date: 2014-10-08 09:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rosecathy1.livejournal.com
<3 Very similar to my view.

I think (this is my related rambling now, not to put words in your mouth) he and Rimmer differ in how far they're initially willing to go with their own bodies and sexuality. This is part of why I tend to write Lister as bottoming and/or taking on a submissive role, at least to start — I see him saying "This feels good, I want to do more" without agonising too much over his masculinity, etc. Within the same background of love/trust/safety in which this happens, Rimmer could also enjoy doing subby things, but it might take some time.

Date: 2014-10-10 04:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rosecathy1.livejournal.com
Oh, definitely. I was trying to convey the separation with the "and/or". :) As a follow-up, Lister (IMO) would be more willing to be vulnerable as well, emotionally and sexually. Such a romantic. :p

Domme-ish Lise Yates...now that's an idea.

Date: 2014-10-10 05:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] felineranger.livejournal.com
Oh, I think Listy definitely appreciates a lady who can take charge now and then. Pete Tranters sister, anyone?

Date: 2014-10-09 08:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lordvalerymimes.livejournal.com
I think this is an absolutely perfect way of looking at the dynamic that the two of them have. I bow down to your incredible characterizations. :D

Profile

reddwarfslash: (Default)
Red Dwarf Slash

August 2017

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
1314151617 1819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 12th, 2025 03:17 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios