Head Canons And Lister's Sexuality
Oct. 7th, 2014 09:52 pm![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
We all have them, but some are more deeply entrenched than others. The recent plethora of BDSM fic (thank you, Kronette and Felineranger) made me realise that I have problems imagining Lister as a natural, dyed in the wool submissive, which *spoiler* is a major aspect of "Lessons In Heroics", even though it's an alternate version of him.
(Kronette, this is not a criticism of your fic in any way. You can write whatever the hell you like and I'm finding the story riveting regardless.) :)
Those who are following this story will know that, on the list of disquieting aspects, an alternate version of Lister being an enthusiastic sub is so far down it shouldn't even register, but somehow it does for me. I think it's because his usual character is so anti rules and regulations that it's hard to imagine BDSM being a fundamental part of his sexuality. Which isn't to say I can't see him enjoying it (as in "FSOS") but enjoying and needing are different.
I apologise in advance if my ramblings offend anyone. I don't mean to imply that there's anything wrong with being a natural sub or Dom, just that it's not how I interpret his character. I can imagine either of Rimmer though.
Does anyone else have head canons which you thought were casual until you read a fic which contradicted them?
(Kronette, this is not a criticism of your fic in any way. You can write whatever the hell you like and I'm finding the story riveting regardless.) :)
Those who are following this story will know that, on the list of disquieting aspects, an alternate version of Lister being an enthusiastic sub is so far down it shouldn't even register, but somehow it does for me. I think it's because his usual character is so anti rules and regulations that it's hard to imagine BDSM being a fundamental part of his sexuality. Which isn't to say I can't see him enjoying it (as in "FSOS") but enjoying and needing are different.
I apologise in advance if my ramblings offend anyone. I don't mean to imply that there's anything wrong with being a natural sub or Dom, just that it's not how I interpret his character. I can imagine either of Rimmer though.
Does anyone else have head canons which you thought were casual until you read a fic which contradicted them?
no subject
Date: 2014-10-07 10:36 pm (UTC)For me though, it's Rimmer's sexuality. I've mentioned it before, but I find it really hard to imagine him as anything other than gay or asexual (and if so, homoromantic). And it simply didn't occur to me that anyone would think otherwise until I came across fic in which he happily is attracted to women. And before anyone mentions him happily being attracted to women in canon, well, no, we see him having SEX with women in canon, and doing a whole lot of what I personally have always seen as obviously "protesting too much". But I won't get into an essay about that here. *looks around* Unless anyone wants me to. :p
no subject
Date: 2014-10-07 11:19 pm (UTC)I can also see a fair amount for evidence for viewing him as asexual and homoromantic. Please do get into an essay about his sexuality if you're so inclined. ;)
no subject
Date: 2014-10-07 11:24 pm (UTC)Not to go off on a tangent - though I suppose it's still perfectly on topic - LONG before I was into slash or even fic; when I first saw that episode as a child, and later as a young teen, the idea that Rimmer would somehow fall in love with Nirvanah that quickly never sat right with me. I distinctly remember being utterly annoyed by the implication. So I think it's clear that it can't be love, though I'm equally certain that someone like Rimmer, so canonically inexperienced and uncertain about his identity on so many levels, and so eager to be normal and conform, might see it that way.
Hee, I'll see what I come up with. :)
no subject
Date: 2014-10-08 02:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-08 12:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-07 10:44 pm (UTC)As for the D/S issue, while I have my own take, it doesn't usually bother me when someone writes an opposing interpretation. Personalities outside the bedroom can be and are often deceiving; certain experiences, rather than traits, might be correlated with certain preferences, maybe. Also, there are degrees of dominance and submission. Even the Lister in Heroics is submissive primarily in terms of romance and sex, not so much in other areas like some who are in 24/7 arrangements, so I don't see his submission as particularly regulation-based. This is my reading, of course, and
no subject
Date: 2014-10-07 11:44 pm (UTC)I realise I don't know that much about D/s relationships and am probably projecting my own assumptions a bit. FWIW, I found the initial portrayal of the relationship between alternate Rimmer and Lister in "Heroics" to be reasonably convincing - it was only towards the end of the latest chapter when Lister became more and more passive and seemed to stop having a life of his own at all that I began to think it was OOC. I realise that there's almost certainly more to that than meets the eye and I await the final chapter with bated breath.
(Kronette, I hope you don't mind having your WIP discussed here. I'm only doing so because it's gripping me so much.) :)
no subject
Date: 2014-10-08 06:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-08 07:14 pm (UTC)This is a direct quote from the V booklet: "Briefly revived in "Holoship", it came as a surprise that Sam was male. In the original pilot script - and Series I's deleted funeral scene [from "The End"] - deceased crew member "Sam Murray" is said to be dating "Rick Thesen". Possibly Red Dwarf's first gay couple?"
If you remember, Felineranger took that interpretation and ran with it in "FSOS". ;)
no subject
Date: 2014-10-07 11:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-07 11:51 pm (UTC)Although I'm trying to remember whether Chen or Selby ever call him Dave. I always thought Petersen didn't because English isn't his first language...
no subject
Date: 2014-10-08 12:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-08 06:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-08 12:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-08 06:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-08 06:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-08 06:35 pm (UTC)Also, it's not really about what Lister prefers to be called, but rather what I feel the names represent to him consciously or not. And who says it matters. I'm not sure if that's any clearer than what Vero said much more succinctly. :p
no subject
Date: 2014-10-08 06:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-08 09:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-08 07:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-08 08:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-08 08:57 pm (UTC)I'll have to watch those scenes in "Emohawk" again and count the endearments. :D
no subject
Date: 2014-10-08 09:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-09 08:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-08 07:41 pm (UTC)As for having my headcanon fucked with -- well, the big example I have comes from Doug Naylor. Before Duct Soup, I always saw Lister as having a "whatever" attitude towards gender and just being attracted to whoever he was attracted to. I still don't see him as having or even considering a monosexual identity but his attitude about it is probably not as conscious or as nuanced as I, the viewer (who is also writer, who is also a queer woman), would like it to be. I don't think he would see himself as being "romantically attracted to multiple genders," so much as just Romantic.
He's got this wonderful nurturing instinct that he turns on just about everyone apart from Kochanski, coupled with an odd insecurity around people he's apparently infatuated with (Kochanski). The infatuations themselves appear to have little staying power when matched against caring for someone he likes (I know they're bunked in different cell blocks, but look how quickly the fixation on Kochanski stalls when he has a Rimmer to irritate in series VIII) and, instead, thrive in a vacuum such as the one created by the physical absence of that person (for that matter, he dreams about kissing Rimmer after Rimmer's gone).
no subject
Date: 2014-10-08 09:16 pm (UTC)Ah, "Duct Soup". On the one hand it gave us Lister in those longjohns; on the other it fucked with a lot of people's interpretation of his character. (Not just slashers; I've read comments on TOS about how OOC some posters find it.)
The good news is we can write fics to get around it, I suppose. "Nurturing" is a good word to describe him and one of the reasons why m-preg rather suits him. ;)
no subject
Date: 2014-10-09 08:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-10 03:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-10 05:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-10 09:30 pm (UTC)And here's one of her Jim and Bexley fics. You can find more on the RD Fanfic comm which is for gen and het: http://reddwarffanfic.livejournal.com/24463.html
no subject
Date: 2014-10-17 04:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-17 11:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-09 08:30 pm (UTC)I just pretend that a lot of things in series VII didn't happen. Apart from Lister's long johns.
no subject
Date: 2014-10-10 03:55 pm (UTC)This may be a case of the actor's natural confidence and charisma clashing with the writing of his character. You could say the same about the fact that we're expected to believe someone who looks like Chris has only encountered one person in 31 years prepared to overlook his personality long enough for a quickie. ;)
(Looking back at that, I'm not suggesting that conventionally attractive people must inevitably have sexual experience, just that Chris's legion of rl fans makes Rimmer's "loser" persona a bit hard to swallow sometimes.) :p
no subject
Date: 2014-10-10 05:58 pm (UTC)This exactly. I think as the show progressed they allowed Craig's natural charisma to mold the character of Lister a bit more. He started off being so much more of a bum, but became quite cool as the show progressed.
Chris is gorgeous in my eyes, but I can see where people who go for the more typical type of a "heartthrob" ie: Brad Pitt, George Clooney, Channing Tatum sorts, wouldn't get what we see in him. Chris is good-looking, but not in a conventional way. Plus he was quite skinny at the start of the series which didn't really jibe with the stereotypical "hunky" thing that was considered attractive in the late 80s early 90s. Not everyone who looks at those flaring nostrils goes weak in the knees. ;-)
I sure do though.
no subject
Date: 2014-10-08 09:18 pm (UTC)See, as in many things, Lister and Rimmer are polar opposites. Rimmer craves power and authority because he's spent his whole life being pushed down, whereas Lister I think shies away from serious responsibility because he's had to look after himself from a relatively young age. Rimmer has the desire to lead but not the capability, Lister has the capability but not the desire.
Let's look at Lister's early fantasy of marriage to Kochanski as an example. She was going to wear a white dress and ride the horses and he would take care of everything else. Because why wouldn't he? He always has. As the series goes on, it is always Lister who has to step up, always him who takes charge. He does it automatically. In Rimmerworld, we're told that he has been hiding the severity of their situation from his crewmates, even going so far as to rig the readouts so they won't worry. He doesn't have to, but he takes it on himself to shoulder the responsibility alone. Because he doesn't trust anyone else.
If Lister has any kind of submissive desires, that's where they stem from. Not necessarily wanting someone to dominate him, but wanting someone to look after him. He has a hard time admitting it, and even harder time trusting someone enough to let them do it, but once he reaches that point he becomes almost childlike. Take his relationship with Kryten for example - he starts out being very reluctant to let Kryten do ANYTHING for him. By the time we hit S7, Kryten has become a fully fledged mother figure, even cutting up his toast 'just like you asked for, Sir'. When given the opportunity, Lister regresses to a blanket-wrapped, video game playing overgrown kid. With the right person, in the right circumstances, if he felt truly safe, I think Lister could be very submissive. He just needs the right person to lift that weight off his shoulders.
no subject
Date: 2014-10-08 09:58 pm (UTC)I think (this is my related rambling now, not to put words in your mouth) he and Rimmer differ in how far they're initially willing to go with their own bodies and sexuality. This is part of why I tend to write Lister as bottoming and/or taking on a submissive role, at least to start — I see him saying "This feels good, I want to do more" without agonising too much over his masculinity, etc. Within the same background of love/trust/safety in which this happens, Rimmer could also enjoy doing subby things, but it might take some time.
no subject
Date: 2014-10-10 04:07 pm (UTC)Whereas Rimmer would need a lot more coaxing to even engage in man-on-man action let alone anything more complicated.
no subject
Date: 2014-10-10 04:58 pm (UTC)Domme-ish Lise Yates...now that's an idea.
no subject
Date: 2014-10-10 06:40 pm (UTC)*Cough* Kink Meme prompt. *Cough* ;)
no subject
Date: 2014-10-10 05:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-10-10 06:44 pm (UTC)The more I think about Lister's sexuality the harder it is to categorise. Let's just say "flexible and adaptable". :)
no subject
Date: 2014-10-08 11:15 pm (UTC)(In the context of "Heroics", it's obviously not surprising that having fallen hard for Rimmer at a very young age, Lister would go into serious denial that anything was wrong once he resurrected him as a hologram. I have confused feelings about the whole thing and probably need to reread.)
Returning to our Lister, that's a powerful argument and makes more sense if you emphasise the "caring for" aspect rather than the "domination" one.
I should probably add that I have yet to stop reading a fic because it clashes with my headcanon. If it's worth reading it keeps my attention regardless. :)
no subject
Date: 2014-10-09 08:33 pm (UTC)